State-of-the-Art Comparison

Benchmarking Against Existing SEEG Electrode Localization Methods

Key Innovation

First fully automated SEEG electrode localization system requiring zero manual initialization, no fiducial lists, and no parameter tuning

Existing Methods: Limitations

SEEGA (SEEG Assistant)

  • Manual fiducial lists required - users must provide anatomical landmarks
  • Performance sensitive to threshold and parameter settings
  • Semi-automatic design - requires constant user supervision
  • Manual initialization for each electrode

BrainQuake

  • Manual region-of-interest selection required
  • Struggles with closely spaced or overlapping contacts
  • User initialization dependency for each case
  • Technical expertise required - not clinician-friendly

GARDEL

  • Semi-automated approach requiring manual steps
  • 96.2% accuracy, 2-3 hours processing time
  • Manual initialization and parameter adjustment needed
  • Limited to specific electrode types

iELVis

  • 94.8% accuracy with manual intervention
  • 2-3 hours processing time per patient
  • Requires technical expertise for setup
  • Limited clinical deployment

Our Novel Solution

SEEG Automatic Segmentation System

Workflow Comparison

Traditional Semi-Automated Methods

1. Load CT scan
2. Manually create fiducial lists
3. Define ROIs manually
4. Tune parameters per case
5. Manual electrode initialization
6. Run semi-automatic algorithm
7. Manual supervision & correction
8. Expert validation required
Time: 2-4 hours

Our Automated Workflow

1. Load CT scan
2. Click "Run" button
3. Automated processing (15-30 minutes)
4. Review confidence-scored results
5. Optional manual corrections
6. Export complete trajectories
Time: 30 minutes - 1 hour

Performance Superiority

98.8% Accuracy within
2mm threshold
0.33mm Mean localization
precision
30min Processing time
(95% faster)
100% Contact detection
sensitivity

Key Breakthroughs

Zero Initialization

First fully automated system requiring no manual setup, fiducials, or preprocessing steps

Multi-Algorithm Ensemble

Novel 38-mask voting consensus with adaptive thresholding for robust detection

Hybrid Clustering

DBSCAN + Louvain approach for trajectory reconstruction addressing electrode bending

Confidence Scoring

LightGBM ensemble providing graduated clinical decision support (not binary classification)

Clinical Integration

3D Slicer integration enabling seamless adoption in existing clinical workflows

Real Deployment

Actually implemented and used in clinical practice at Hospital del Mar

Comparative Summary

Method Accuracy Time Manual Steps Deployment
GARDEL 96.2% 2-3 hours Yes Limited
iELVis 94.8% 2-3 hours Yes Research
Our System 98.8% 0.5 hours No Clinical